The US Senate on Thursday (May 14) unanimously approved a resolution to withhold senators’ salaries during government shutdowns, marking a rare bipartisan effort to impose financial consequences on lawmakers when Congress fails to pass funding bills.
The measure comes after a series of prolonged federal shutdowns over the past year disrupted government operations and left thousands of federal employees without paychecks.
Under the resolution, senators’ salaries would be withheld by the secretary of the Senate whenever a shutdown affects one or more federal agencies. The withheld pay would only be released after government funding is restored.
People also ask
AI powered insights from this story
What is the new US Senate resolution regarding lawmakers’ salaries during government shutdowns?⌵
The US Senate unanimously approved a resolution to withhold senators’ salaries during government shutdowns. This measure means senators’ pay will be withheld by the secretary of the Senate whenever a shutdown affects federal agencies and will only be released after government funding is restored.
When does the new policy of withholding senators’ salaries during shutdowns take effect?⌵
The new policy, which involves withholding senators’ salaries during government shutdowns, is scheduled to take effect the day after the November 3 general election.
Why was the resolution to withhold senators’ salaries during shutdowns introduced?⌵
The resolution was introduced to impose financial consequences on lawmakers when Congress fails to pass funding bills. It aims to ensure shared sacrifice during shutdowns and address the financial strain federal employees face.
Does the salary freeze resolution apply to members of the US House of Representatives?⌵
No, the resolution applies only to senators and does not extend to members of the US House of Representatives. Senator John Kennedy suggested tensions between the chambers played a role in this exclusion.
How does the new resolution differ from a potential constitutional amendment regarding congressional pay during shutdowns?⌵
Unlike a constitutional amendment that would permanently forfeit pay, Kennedy’s resolution avoids constitutional complications by delaying lawmakers’ pay instead of eliminating it entirely. This is because changing the Constitution requires ratification by three-fourths of US states.
The new policy is scheduled to take effect the day after the November 3 general election.
‘Putting our money where our mouth is’
The resolution was introduced by John Kennedy, who argued that lawmakers should share the burden created by political deadlocks in Washington.
“Shutting down government should not be our default solution to our refusal to work out our issues and our differences,” Kennedy said during a Senate floor speech on Wednesday.
“This is about putting our money where our mouth is,” the Republican senator added.
Kennedy later told reporters the proposal was intended to ensure “shared sacrifice” during shutdowns, though he acknowledged the measure did not go as far as he would personally prefer.
Shutdowns becoming longer and more frequent
The move follows two major that caused severe financial strain for federal employees, especially workers at the .
The department only reopened last month after a — the longest agency funding lapse in US history.
That closure came just months after a separate , which also set a record at the time.
Lawmakers from both parties have increasingly faced criticism for allowing to drag on while members of Congress continued receiving salaries.
Constitution protects Congressional pay
Under the US Constitution, members of Congress must continue to receive compensation even during shutdowns, unlike many federal workers who can be furloughed or temporarily unpaid.
During the earlier full government shutdown tied to disputes over healthcare subsidies, senator Lindsey Graham proposed a constitutional amendment that would require lawmakers to permanently forfeit pay during shutdown periods.
“If members of Congress had to forfeit their pay during government shutdowns, there would be fewer shutdowns and they would end quicker,” Graham said at the time.
However, Graham acknowledged that changing the Constitution would be a difficult process because amendments require ratification by three-fourths of US states.
By contrast, Kennedy’s resolution avoids constitutional complications by delaying lawmakers’ pay instead of eliminating it entirely.
Senate-House tensions surface
The resolution applies only to senators and does not extend to members of the .
Asked why the House was excluded, Kennedy suggested tensions between the two chambers played a role.
“The House’s business is the House’s business,” he said.
Kennedy also joked about the increasingly strained relationship between lawmakers in both chambers.
“There’s a very strong undercurrent of animosity among some of my friends in the House,” he remarked.
“It’s quickly becoming like two kids fighting in the back of a minivan,” Kennedy added.
(With AP inputs)
