Trump revives debate over California’s Sable pipeline project amid pushback from Newsom, West Coast governors

File image of the US President Donald Trump

US President once again reignited his administration’s ongoing energy dispute with California. On August 2 (local time), he took to his Truth Social platform to highlight a previous executive order he signed to resume oil operations tied to the Sable Pipeline and significantly expand offshore oil production off the state’s coast.

Also Read |

Trump revives spotlight on California offshore oil project

Trump shared a graphic on Truth Social highlighting an executive order authorising the Department of Energy (DOE) to invoke the Defense Production Act to restart the Sable Pipeline. The post also said Energy Secretary Chris Wright would issue an order leading to the “immediate production of 50,000 barrels of oil per day,” which the White House said would increase offshore in California by 550 per cent.

The post further said the Sable Pipeline would produce “20 million barrels of oil equivalent per year” to meet the Department of Defense (DOD)’s requirements, referred to as the “Department of War,” and supply 50 military installations along the West Coast. It also claimed the order would override “radical California climate laws,” describing the move as an effort to end the Golden State’s “coordinated regulatory attacks on American energy dominance.”

California Governor Newsom responds

According to a Newsweek report, when asked to respond to the ‘s latest post, California Governor Gavin Newsom’s office referred to its previously released statement on the matter. Earlier in March, said, “Donald Trump started a war, admitted it would spike gas prices nationwide, and told Americans it was a small price to pay. Now he’s using this crisis of his own making to attempt what he’s wanted to do for years: open California’s coast for his oil industry friends so they can poison our beaches.” He added, “California will not stand by while the Trump administration attempts to sacrifice our coastal communities, our environment, and our $51 billion coastal economy.”

Also Read |

DOE directs Sable Corp to restore ops at Santa Ynez Unit

Earlier in March, directed Sable Corp to restore operations at the Santa Ynez Unit and the Santa Ynez Pipeline System and cited supply disruption risks caused by California policies that have left the region and US military forces dependent on foreign oil. The Energy Secretary said the executive order would boost the country’s oil supply and restore a pipeline system, which he described as “vital to our national security and defense.” DOE noted that Sable’s facility would result in the production of roughly 50,000 barrels per day, marking a 15 per cent increase in California’s in-state oil production. Wright noted that the output could replace nearly 1.5 million barrels of foreign each month.

West Coast Governors push back against Trump’s order

According to Newsweek, the latest post from the US President came amid a conflict between his administration and California officials over offshore drilling. Previously, Newsom had dismissed reports of Trump’s plan to expand drilling off California’s coast as “dead on arrival in California” and claimed the state would “absolutely” challenge the plan in court if finalized.

Also Read |

However, later the Trump administration released a five-year leasing plan that included six offshore lease sales off the California coast between 2027 and 2030, where no new federal leases had been issued since the mid-1980s. The proposal also included drilling in waters at least 100 miles off Florida’s shoreline and more than 20 additional lease sales off .

California has repeatedly opposed new offshore drilling. In November, Newsom called Trump’s offshore drilling proposal “idiotic” and a “reckless attempt to sell out our coastline to his Big Oil donors.” In January, he joined the governors of Oregon and Washington in formally opposing new oil and gas lease sales off California’s coast, warning of risks to coastal economies, marine ecosystems and communities.

Source

Posted in US

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 + twenty =